Ever hear this one? "Atheists have a problem. They
can't explain where the universe came from. You can't create something from
nothing, and that's a big problem for atheism."
It's a common and bewildering notion that atheists need to
be able to explain every mystery in the universe before making the audacious suggestion
that maybe there isn't an invisible magic man in the sky.
Ok, so I don't know where the universe came from. I don't
know why there's something rather than nothing. But why would my lack of knowledge
conflict with my lack of belief? Ignorance and disbelief go together perfectly.
In fact, one logically follows from the other. If I don't know what caused the universe, then I don't believe in any particular explanation. I'm open to the possibility
that a god created it, as well as other possibilities, but I'm not going to
settle for any particular explanation without proof. To put it as simply as I
can, I don't know that God created
the universe, so I don't believe that
God created the universe.
In a Venn diagram of a rational person's mind, knowledge and
belief should be indistinguishable. They should be right on top of each other,
not just overlapping. To know without believing is denial, and to believe
without knowing is faith.
If we are honestly seeking the truth, we won't find it by
inventing magical explanations for things we don't understand. The existence of
the universe doesn't prove a god anymore than presents under a tree prove Santa
Clause. Just because we don't know how it got there, doesn't mean there has to
be a supernatural being who put it there.
The fact that I don't know where the universe came from is
not a problem for me, because I'm not the one claiming to know where the
universe came from. The problem is with theists who claim the universe came
from a god, but have no proof.
No comments:
Post a Comment